As many of you are no doubt aware , I believe that there is a real risk of closures being proposed in the near future. However , by no means is this view universal , even though some have worries that are very similiar.
PLYMOUTH & CORNWALL
Times article "Standing room only on shorter trains" link.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2090057,00.htmlQuote from the above article :
" Alistair Darling, the (then) Transport Secretary, admitted that he was partly responsible for the West Country cuts. He said: “I am not seeking to avoid blame. We cannot be in the business of carting fresh air round the country. If we are terrified to go near any service for fear of flak, then sooner or later we will come a cropper.”
Mr Darling said that the Liskeard-to-Looe branch line had attracted an average of only nine passengers a train in the twelve months to last April. But the Devon and Cornwall Community Rail Partnership said that Mr Darling was using misleading figures based only on tickets sold.
Richard Burningham, the partnership’s manager, said: “Trains on the Looe branch are so crowded in summer that the conductor cannot get down the aisle to sell tickets.”
Below are the views of Richard Burningham (e-mail dated 26/02/2006) , who has run the Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership for over eight years , and is someone who we can definately say lives in the area :
Dear Lee,
Thanks for your e-mail. I've had a look at your website and I've got to say, with great respect, that I think you're wrong.
I've been running the Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership for nearly eight years. We promote six branch lines across the two counties - most of which inevitably top any press list of lines at risk. As you can imagine, I watch very carefully for any sign of a change in Government or railway policy which may threaten any of these lines.
There is no chance whatsoever of the Government taking the action you describe. I have it from the lips of Department of Transport officials that while the Government is interested in saving money (after all the subsidy is now something like 5 times the amount BR received), it is absolutely not interested in closing lines.
Instead, as you may know, we have the Community Rail Development Strategy which is all about developing these lines. We have three lines taking part in a national pilot in the South West and my colleagues and I are working hard with the rail industry, our local authority partners and others to implement the strategy. Last year the strategy allowed the introduction of a half-hourly service on the St Ives Bay line which led to large increases in patronage and revenue.
I notice you have included press releases expressing concern about the First Great Western timetable proposal for December. I too am concerned about these and am working up alternative proposals to put to First. First themselves have told me they will be as flexible as the franchise specification allows - something I and others are talking to the Department of Transport about.
These proposals are nothing to do with closures or anything like it - in fact, despite the fact we have these problems with some of the timetable proposals, the new franchise itself safeguards many of the improvements secured over the last few years, not least all year Sunday services on some Cornish branch lines.
I hope this helps. I really can assure you that there will be no "New Beeching Report" or anything like it next year or as far ahead as I can see now. What we do need to do though is get a lot of these current timetable proposals changed and there is still just over a week for people to respond to the timetable consultation.
Yours,
Richard Burningham,
Manager, Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership
Hardly sounds like a set of lines that needs to be "sold off for steam" (or closed) does it?
Here are some Cornish Branch Line passenger figures since 2001 :
Par - Newquay - up 40%
St Erth - St Ives - up 25%
Liskeard - Looe - up 16%
A couple of final points :
1) When CANBER was launched , I sent out a raft of e-mails , each of which contained the following quote :
"It is our intention to start a debate on the future of the rail network."
Our view was that the true state of the rail network , and what was happening to it , was being deliberately kept quiet. For that reason (and others) , I applaud the fact that virtually every transport group in the South West spoke out against the "bustitution" of the Looe & St Ives lines , thus giving out a signal that FGW could not ignore.
First battle won , many more to follow , perhaps sooner than we think.
2) I always advise people to read the WHOLE of "An Alternative Future."