Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
February 04, 2012, 03:20:25 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 84129 Members
Latest Member: csswafvuhts
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  The Future
| | |-+  GWRUS submission - Melksham railway Development Group
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: GWRUS submission - Melksham railway Development Group  (Read 1112 times)
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
GWRUS submission - Melksham railway Development Group
« on: November 28, 2009, 09:46:31 AM »

Many thanks to the Melksham Railway Development Group http://www.mrdg.org.uk for submitting a good repsonse to the GWRUS in support of the TransWilts case - copy here with their permission:


Quote
Sirs           
 
The GW RUS document invites comments on this document, and we welcome the chance to do so.
 
This response is on behalf of the Melksham Railway Development Group (MRDG) which promotes improvements to the infrastructure and services on the line between Chippenham and Trowbridge, with a view to reinstate a viable rail service at Melksham. Our comments therefore reflect issues raised in 6.9.10.2 and 6.9.10.4.
 
            Chippenham bay
 
We certainly welcome any of the potential  hourly service options through Melksham (Swindon/ Westbury, Chippenham/Salisbury or Chippenham/Westbury). The two last options, combined with a potential Bristol to Chippenham local service, would call for a bay at Chippenham.
 
We suggest that greater value could be achieved if the additional bay were implemented as a passenger loop. This would also improve reliability on both the Swindon to Bath route, (if freight capacity were provided) and also the potential Swindon - Westbury option. The Chippenham to Trowbridge corridor makes most sense if Swindon were the termination point rather than Chippenham.
 
Put simply, we support a bay at Chippenham but believe a long loop may offer additional benefits
 
        Signalling between Thingly Junction and Bradford
 
We believe consideration should be given, whilst resignalling for other reasons (such as mainline electrification), for changes to allow more than 1 train to be in the Thingley to Bradford section when travelling in the same direction. With a section time of 20 minutes, the single train constraint limits capacity, including for freight, at 3 tph  which may be restrictive in the future.
 
        Reinstatement of the Bradford North Curve
 
The link to the North at Bradford was removed in the 80s. Reinstatement would provide a more effective standby route for FGW trains bypassing Box tunnel, and at the same time allow options of Bristol to Chippenham via Melksham. Has this been considered?
                   
Regards
 
John Hamley, PhD
Melksham Railway Development Group
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 19 queries.