Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 01, 2010, 08:40:26 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7821 Posts in 4968 Topics by 147 Members
Latest Member: Toubrefoeme
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Current Service
| | |-+  Who should operate the TransWilts
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Who should operate the TransWilts  (Read 1217 times)
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2036


View Profile
Who should operate the TransWilts
« on: July 06, 2009, 03:50:02 PM »





We have concentrated so long and hard at working with First Great Western ... but seeing them hiring in units to work the line from other companies makes me wonder "perhaps these other companies would like to / should run the service themselves ..."

I don't think that Arriva Trains Wales are well placed ... their contract is with the Welsh assembly, and their units are based in Cardiff; it lacks logic for them to add an isolated English line to their network.

But South West Trains (who already provide the unit for the 07:02 Westbury - Swindon) are a different matter.  Their trains are actually based on the TransWilts, their crews already know the route as far as Trowbridge, and my understanding of ORCATS is that it could be financially attractive to them, in just the same way that ORCATS makes it financially attractive for FGW to run their 'extras' to Southampton and to Brighton.

It would also bring a sprinkling of competition into the area.  Look at Barry Doe's network map and you'll see the railway centres of York, Derby, Crewe, Doncaster and Crewe showing up multicoloured with a multitude of operators at each.   Swindon, though, is monochrome - just FGW.  Perhaps this monopoly is why train travel to and from Swindon is so expensive ... but that's a story for elsewhere
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2036


View Profile
Re: Who should operate the TransWilts
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2009, 07:43:13 AM »



For completeness, I have added a picture of the incumbent (First Great Western) and will make a summary of their case.

First Great Western have stated that their priority is to meet the specification, to run a reliable network, and to prioritise their company's finances over the provision of an appropriate service. They are indeed meeting the specification (which was changed to the detriment of appropriate timings to save them money) and indeed from being truely dreadful, they are now much much more reliable. And they are willing to run the service if subsidised (at a figure that has changed three fold in a year).

Actions speak louder than words, and First's actions in their bid for the franchise, and thereafter, have resulted in a severe degredagtion of provision for the traveller on the corridor.  The picture of their Saturday morning train to Swindon - the once a week service that gives a good 'day in Swindon' opportunity with people queueing to join - shows once again that there is a market.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 19 queries.