Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 11:48:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97698 Members
Latest Member: omnjq296xty
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Greater Britain
| | |-+  Trains Are 'Not Value For Money' - Passenger Focus Survey
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Trains Are 'Not Value For Money' - Passenger Focus Survey  (Read 1262 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Trains Are 'Not Value For Money' - Passenger Focus Survey
« on: July 08, 2008, 11:49:52 AM »

Only four out of 10 rail passengers feel they get value for money, a survey by a rail watchdog suggests (link below.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7494733.stm

The report by Passenger Focus also says people are 5% less satisfied with the value of services than they were in autumn 2007.

Satisfaction ratings fell for 13 companies since spring 2007, rose for seven and stayed the same for one.

However, 80% of the 25,000 people surveyed in the new poll were satisfied with journey quality: 2% up a year ago.

The latest Passenger Focus survey was conducted at about 650 stations between January and March, 2008.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 19 queries.