Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 10:57:54 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97695 Members
Latest Member: Flencillun
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Greater Britain
| | |-+  Privatised railways from a Swiss perspective
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Privatised railways from a Swiss perspective  (Read 1604 times)
Industry Insider
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 128


View Profile
Privatised railways from a Swiss perspective
« on: May 25, 2008, 10:11:48 PM »

The Swiss have had loads of private railway companies operating over quite large areas for many years. Anyone with Sky might like to tune in to the Travel Channel 2 channel (263), on Sundays or Tuesdays when the whole day is devoted to Swiss railway journeys.

Some of the scenery on display is worth tuning in for alone, but it is also interesting to compare the railway operations with our own. Almost every route is electrified, low level european style platforms and a much more relaxed attitute to safety - no sign of any fences in the rural areas. I bet they don't have to cancel a train if the Selective Door Operation system fails!
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: Privatised railways from a Swiss perspective
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2008, 12:10:13 PM »

Yes, on the safety side I do feel that UK rail - which is much safer than roads anyway - goes to an extreme that's perhaps more emotionally than financially or practically based.  But that one's a very tough discussion as one injury is one too many, and anyone who argues against a safety rule or feature, no matter how expensive, is labelled as putting a callous price on life when it can be the opposite. 
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.051 seconds with 19 queries.