Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 06:17:45 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97678 Members
Latest Member: Unwilicinspen
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  The Future
| | |-+  More Upcoming PWQ's
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: More Upcoming PWQ's  (Read 5282 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
More Upcoming PWQ's
« on: November 22, 2006, 12:48:18 PM »

Many upcoming PWQ's are of interest. Here are todays (link below.)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmordbk1/61122w01.htm
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2006, 11:39:04 AM »

Here are todays equally interesting PWQ's (link below.)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmordbk1/61123w01.htm
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2006, 11:50:57 AM »

The following upcoming PWQ's may also be of interest :

Chris Grayling (Epsom & Ewell): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many trains of each train company were cancelled in the last 12 months; how many of those trains were cancelled (a) before reaching their final destination and (b) before departure; and what the reason was for each cancellation.

Chris Grayling (Epsom & Ewell): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many trains were cancelled because of vandalism on the tracks (a) in each region and (b) by each train operating company in each year since 1997.

Mrs Siân C. James (Swansea East): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make a statement on the removal of buffet bar mark III coaches on First Great Western services; and what assessment he has made of the partial implications for comfort during long distance travel.

Mrs Siân C. James (Swansea East): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the minimum train service requirement to (a) Bristol and (b) the West Country is under the Greater Western Franchise; and what changes in service levels there have been since the previous franchise.

Mrs Siân C. James (Swansea East): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what operating revenue First Great Western is making on its service from London Paddington to Swansea for the most recent period for which figures are available.

Mrs Siân C. James (Swansea East): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent passenger counts First Great Western have undertaken to South Wales services; and with what results.

Mrs Siân C. James (Swansea East): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what are First Great Western Trains public service requirements in relation to peak time services provision between Cardiff Central and Swansea during 5 pm to 6 pm.
 
Mrs Siân C. James (Swansea East): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what maximum journey times does the Greater Western franchise agreement standards include for services between London Paddington to Swansea; what the average length of journey time is on this route; and what such length of time was during the last two years of operation by British Rail.

Mrs Theresa May (Maidenhead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, why the service level commitment for the Greater Western Franchise excludes (a) Wargrave and Shiplake on the Henley-on-Thames line and (b) Cookham on the Marlow line.

Mr David Drew (Stroud): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will urgently investigate the reliability of the 125 fleet on the Great Western lines; and what discussions he has had with First Great Western on its refurbishment and replacement programme.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2006, 01:40:05 PM »

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will urgently investigate the reliability of the 125 fleet on the Great Western lines; and what discussions he has had with First Great Western on its refurbishment and replacement programme.

Mr. Tom Harris: I have held a number of meetings with First Great Western and Network Rail to discuss a range performance issues. Joint action plans are in place between Network Rail and FGW to address these issues and are monitored monthly.

The first modified First Great Western High Speed Train (‘HST’) power cars have already entered service. My officials meet FGW regularly to review progress on the HST refurbishment and modification programme.

Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2006, 01:51:54 PM »

Miss Anne McIntosh (Vale of York):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the financial stability of rail franchises.

Mr Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Cotswold): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what response he has made to the findings of the National Rail Review for Quarter Two, that passengers have not yet seen an improvement in the condition or availability of facilities and services at small or medium-sized rail stations.

Mr Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Cotswold): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what funds were (a) allocated and (b) spent by National Rail on enhancing the general cleanliness, facilities and services of small and medium-sized railway stations in each of the last four years; how many such projects Network Rail undertook in that period; and what representations he has made to Network Rail on =this issue.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2006, 12:37:32 PM »

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how his Department has taken account of EU procurement rules in retaining the services of a company to act as an operator of the last resort in the event of franchise failure.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department employs on a regular basis (a) consultancies and (b) other companies to provide advice on the Department's responsibility when acting as an operator of the last resort in the event of franchise failure.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much was paid to companies to act as an operator of the last resort on behalf of the Strategic Rail Authority or his Department in each of the last five years; how this fee package was structured; what tender process was used to appoint such companies; and if he will make a statement.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department pays a retainer to any companies to act as an operator of the last resort in the event of franchise failure; and if he will make a statement.

Mr David Evennett (Bexleyheath & Crayford): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent representations he has received on the Kent Integrated Railway franchise.

Mr Brian Jenkins (Tamworth): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether plans exist to begin running a 24-hour train service (a) on lines that serve major cities and (b) on other lines.

Mr Lee Scott (Ilford North): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions his Department has had with Network Rail on the restoration of the direct rail link between Skipton and Colne.

Mr Don Touhig (Islwyn): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with Railtrack to resolve the issue of trains from the Ebbw Valley going directly to Newport when the line is re-opened in 2007.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions (a) he and (b) his officials have had with (i) the Mayor of London and (ii) Transport for London on (A) the relationship between the new London Rail Concession (LRC) and other national rail services in London and (B) the possible impact of the policy on open access on the LRC.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions the Strategic Rail Authority has had with bidders for the (a) Integrated Kent franchise and (b) South Western franchise on the impact of the policy of open access on (i) operation of the franchise and (ii) potential (A) subsidy from and (B) revenue to the Government over the course of the franchise.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the likely impact of the Office of Rail Regulation's policy on track access rights and open access on the franchise round for East Midlands, West Midlands and Cross Country services.

John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) consulted (a) freight and passenger operators and (b) current or potential holders of track access rights on access to the route covered by the London Rail Concession being tendered by Transport for London (TfL); and what discussions his Department had with TfL and ORR on this issue.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2006, 01:49:13 PM »

Here are some answers :

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the financial stability of rail franchises.

Mr. Tom Harris: The deliverability of Franchise proposals is assessed at contract award. The financial position of franchises is kept under review throughout the contract.

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the removal of buffet bar mark III coaches on First Great Western services; and what assessment he has made of the partial implications for comfort during long distance travel.

Mr. Tom Harris: The level and type of on-train catering is a matter for train operators’ commercial judgment rather than for the Department for Transport to determine.

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the minimum train service requirement to (a) Bristol and (b) the West Country is under the Greater Western Franchise; and what changes in service levels there have been since the previous franchise.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Service Level Commitment 2 (‘SLC2’) for the First Great Western franchise is available in the House of Commons Library. The Passenger Service Requirements of the former First Great Western and Wessex Trains franchises are also available in the House of Commons Library.

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what maximum journey times the Greater Western franchise agreement standards includes for services between London Paddington to Swansea; what the average length of journey time is on this route; and what that length of time was during the last two years of operation by British Rail.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Service Level Commitment 2 (‘SLC2’) for the First Great Western franchise is available in the House of Commons Library.

The average through journey times between London Paddington to Swansea are as follows:

London—Swansea (now)
 3 hours
 
Swansea—London (now)
 3 hours 3 minutes
 
London—Swansea (1995)
 2 hours 58 minutes
 
Swansea—London (1995)
 3 hours 2 minutes
 
London—Swansea (1994)
 2 hours 58 minutes
 
Swansea—London (1994)
 3 hours 2 minutes

A copy of SLC2 can be found in the link below.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_foi/documents/page/dft_foi_612541.pdf
 
However , it should be noted that , as the link below shows , the requirements of SLC2 are being routinely ignored.
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=409.msg1211#msg1211
« Last Edit: November 30, 2006, 12:22:34 PM by Lee » Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2006, 01:42:45 PM »

Bob Spink (Castle Point): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many miles of light railway are projected for completion in the next five years; and how many projects are involved.

Bob Spink (Castle Point): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate he has made of how many miles of main and branch line track have been converted to light railway use in each of the last 10 years.

Mr David Drew (Stroud): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, on what basis he has agreed rail fare increases in the next calendar year; whether such rises were factored into recent franchise negotiations; and if he will link future fare increases to the rate of inflation.

Mr David Drew (Stroud): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the socio-economic profile of passenger use of the railways and its effects on the structuring of fares.

Mr Stewart Jackson (Peterborough): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether he plans to investigate the feasibility of establishing new railway stations in areas of significant growth in residential housing in the east of England; and if he will make a statement.

Also , the following PWQ's are not strictly relevant , but ive included them anyway.....

Mr David Laws (Yeovil): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many parliamentary written questions his Department received in each parliamentary session since 2001; and how many of these questions (a) were not answered because of disproportionate cost, (b) were not answered, (c) received answers referring back to a previous answer (i) asked by the hon. Member and (ii) asked by another hon. Member and (d) were grouped together for answer.

Mr David Laws (Yeovil): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what target his Department has for the maximum acceptable amount of time to answer parliamentary written questions; and what percentage of parliamentary answers met that target in each parliamentary session since 2001.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2006, 04:22:55 PM »

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what First Great Western Trains' public service requirements are in relation to peak time services provision between Cardiff Central and Swansea during 5pm to 6pm.

Mr. Tom Harris: The service level commitment 2 (‘SLC2’) for the First Great Western franchise is available in the House of Commons Library. (it is also available in one of the posts above Grin )

Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport why the service level commitment for the Greater Western Franchise excludes (a) Wargrave and Shiplake on the Henley-on-Thames line and (b) Cookham on the Marlow line.

Mr. Tom Harris: The service level commitment for the Greater Western franchise does not exclude Wargrave, Shiplake or Cookham stations on the Henley-on-Thames and Marlow branches.

Wrong , im afraid , Mr Harris :

2 Frequency

2.1 Mondays to Fridays

(a) Between and including the Early and Late Services, 19 services shall be provided at hourly intervals. One interval in one direction may be extended to 1 hour 15 minutes. Services in each direction may omit to call at Wargrave and Shiplake provided an hourly interval service is maintained at these stations.

Not sure about Cookham though  Roll Eyes
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2006, 05:37:50 PM »

Mr David Drew (Stroud):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the effects of differentiation between peak and off-peak fares and the effects on lower income users of the rail system; and what plans he has to discuss these issues with the train companies.

Mr Iain Wright (Hartlepool):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the effect of the recent increase in rail fares by train operators; and if he will make a statement.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2006, 03:32:37 PM »

Dr. Gibson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how frequently rail franchises are reviewed; and under what circumstances franchise conditions can be altered.

Mr. Tom Harris: The performance of all rail franchises is continually monitored. Changes to a franchise specification and committed outputs are only made when there are major changes to the market demand for the services of the franchise or other external factors require a change. Examples are the opening of a new station or a change to the rail network. Such changes are negotiated with the franchisee through the provisions contained in the franchise agreement.

Mr. Carmichael: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many trains of each train company were cancelled in the last 12 months; how many of those trains were cancelled (a) before reaching their final destination and (b) before departure; and what the reason was for each cancellation.

Mr. Tom Harris: Train running data for the Rail Network as a whole is collected and processed by Network Rail. The Department holds information on total passenger train cancellations broken down by franchise but not by the reason for each cancellation.

Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether plans exist to begin running a 24-hour train service (a) on lines that serve major cities and (b) on other lines.

Mr. Tom Harris: No such plans exist.

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what operating revenue First Great Western is making on its service from London Paddington to Swansea for the most recent period for which figures are available.

Mr. Tom Harris: Detailed break-downs of rail franchisees' revenues are commercially confidential.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2006, 03:37:26 PM »

Mr David Drew (Stroud):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, on what basis he has agreed rail fare increases in the next calendar year; whether such rises were factored into recent franchise negotiations; and if he will link future fare increases to the rate of inflation.

Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2006, 01:43:51 PM »

Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether he plans to investigate the feasibility of establishing new railway stations in areas of significant growth in residential housing in the east of England; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Department for Transport will consider any proposals for new stations associated with new developments. Any proposal would require an approved business case and agreement with Network Rail that additional stops on the route could be accommodated. In the majority of cases, it would be expected that third parties would fund the costs.

Mr. Scott: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions his Department has had with Network Rail on the restoration of the direct rail link between Skipton and Colne.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Department has had no discussions with Network Rail on the restoration of a direct rail link between Colne and Skipton.

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how his Department has taken account of EU procurement rules in retaining the services of a company to act as an operator of the last resort in the event of franchise failure.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Strategic Rail Authority awarded a contract in July 2004 to procure specialist advice in connection with “Operator of Last Resort” activity following a competition under one of its framework agreements. The framework agreement was let in full compliance with EU procurement rules. The contract was subsequently transferred to the Department in July 2005 when it assumed the authority's responsibilities.

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether his Department employs (a) consultancies and (b) other companies on a regular basis to provide advice on the Department's responsibility when acting as an operator of the last resort in the event of franchise failure.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Department has a retainer-based contract with First Class Partnerships relating to the procurement of specialist advice in connection with the Secretary of State's duties as “Operator of Last Resort”. It also procures other external specialist advice as and when necessary.

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether his Department pays a retainer to companies to act as an operator of the last resort in the event of franchise failure; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Department has a retainer-based contract with one company—First Class Partnerships—relating to the procurement of specialist advice in connection with the Secretary of State's duties as “Operator of Last Resort”.

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport on what basis he has agreed rail fare increases in the next calendar year; whether such rises were factored into recent franchise negotiations; and if he will link future fare increases to the rate of inflation.

Mr. Tom Harris: Rail fares are set by train operators, not by Government. Fares which are regulated must be set within the limits laid down by fares regulation, which restricts annual average increases to inflation + 1 per cent. Other fares are a commercial matter for the operator concerned. Bids for franchises will take into account both the restrictions imposed by fares regulation and the bidders’ views of how the train service can best be developed, priced and marketed.

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the socio-economic profile of passenger use of the railways and its effects on the structuring of fares.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Department for Transport’s National Rail Travel Survey has collected data on who uses the railways, where, when and for what purposes. The survey was completed last year and covered rail travel across Great Britain. The results will be available early in 2007 and will enable some socio-economic analysis of rail users.

Here is a link to the First Class Partnerships website.
http://www.firstclasspartnerships.com/home.php
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2006, 01:54:34 PM »

Mr Alistair Carmichael (Orkney and Shetland):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 28th November 2006, Official Report, column 516W, on the Eddington Report, what the (a) staff costs, (b) publication costs and (c) other costs were.

Mr James Arbuthnot (North East Hampshire): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when a decision is expected to be made on the scheme to increase railway capacity by 75 per cent. at Reading Station.

Peter Viggers (Gosport): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what tests were applied in judging the viability of the Fareham-Gosport-Portsmouth Light Rapid Transit scheme; and by what measures the scheme fell short of each such test.

Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: More Upcoming PWQ's
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2006, 03:08:20 PM »

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions (a) he and (b) his officials have had with (i) the Mayor of London and (ii) Transport for London on (A) the relationship between the new London Rail Concession (LRC) and other national rail services in London and (B) the possible impact of the policy on open access on the LRC.

Mr. Tom Harris: Officials from the Department for Transport (DfT) have had discussions with Transport for London (TfL) regarding the LRC over the last two years. These discussions have covered a number of issues including the arrangements for transferring the franchising of these services from DfT to TfL.

Services operated by the LRC will continue to be part of the national rail network and will, therefore, have the same relationship with other national rail services (such as ticket purchasing ability and through fares) through the requirements of the passenger licence—although given planned extensions some changes will occur at specific locations.

The relationship between these services and open access operators is a matter for the ORR.

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions the Strategic Rail Authority has had with bidders for the (a) Integrated Kent franchise and (b) South Western franchise on the impact of the policy of open access on (i) operation of the franchise and (ii) potential (A) subsidy from and (B) revenue to the Government over the course of the franchise.

Mr. Tom Harris: To date, the only open access operators in the areas served by the Integrated Kent franchise and the South Western franchise have been the operators of occasional special trains, and freight operators. Accordingly, open access was not specifically raised with bidders during the preparation of their bids for these two franchises.

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the likely impact of the Office of Rail Regulation's policy on track access rights and open access on the franchise round for East Midlands, West Midlands and Cross Country services.

Mr. Tom Harris: The Office of Rail Regulation is currently engaged in a consultation exercise with potential open access operators, and with Network Rail, to establish whether the aspirations of those operators can be accommodated on the network alongside the services to be operated by the three new franchises.

At present, it is anticipated that the new franchisees will be able to obtain track access rights sufficient to enable them to fulfil the Service Level Commitments described in the Invitations to Tender.

ORR will grant rights to open access operators where the new services are primarily intended to create new journey opportunities rather than to abstract revenue from franchised operators.

John Austin: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) consulted (a) freight and passenger operators and (b) current or potential holders of track access rights on access to the route covered by the London Rail Concession being tendered by Transport for London (TfL); and what discussions his Department had with TfL and ORR on this issue.

Mr. Tom Harris: ORR is currently consulting freight and passenger operators and others it considers might be directly affected by the track access option application recently submitted by TfL and Network Rail in relation to access rights for the new East London Line.

No application has yet been received for additional access rights for that part of TfL’s concession that will take over the Silverlink Metro services. ORR will consult in accordance with its published policies on any such application that it receives.

The Department has not held any meetings with either TfL or ORR specifically on the issue of track access rights in relation to the London Rail Concession.

Mr. Clifton-Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what funds were (a) allocated and (b) spent by National Rail on enhancing the general cleanliness, facilities and services of small and medium-sized railway stations in each of the last four years; how many such projects Network Rail undertook in that period; and what representations he has made to Network Rail on this issue.

Mr. Tom Harris: These are operational matters for Network Rail, the owner and operator of the national rail network. The hon. Member is advised to contact Network Rail’s Chief Executive at the following address for a response to his questions:

John Armitt

Chief Executive

Network Rail

40 Melton Street

London

NW1 2EE

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many miles of light railway are projected for completion in the next five years; and how many projects are involved.

Mr. Tom Harris: In the next five years, the following light rail projects are due for completion, subject to satisfying funding approvals:

Extension of the docklands light railway to Woolwich Arsenal—2.5 kms due to complete in 2009

Extension of the docklands light railway to Stratford International—6 kms due to complete in 2010

Extension of the Manchester Metro link to Chorlton and Droylsden—9 kms due to complete in 2011

A further extension of the Manchester Metro link to Rochdale—providing an additional 22.5 kms of light rail, is being taken forward with the Chorlton and Droylsden extensions and is due to complete in 2012.

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent passenger counts First Great Western have undertaken to south Wales services; and with what results.

Mr. Tom Harris: First Great Western has undertaken recent passenger counts for its own management purposes. This information is held by FGW. At the request of the Department for Transport, FGW carried out counts in July of the numbers of passengers on the FGW 1718 Swansea services on departure from Cardiff Central. These showed an average load of 179 passengers on this service.

This topic is continued in the link below.
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=813.msg2363#msg2363
« Last Edit: December 12, 2006, 03:25:41 PM by Lee » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.102 seconds with 19 queries.