Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 04:49:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97666 Members
Latest Member: Inast
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  The Future
| | |-+  FGW Says The Choice Is More Melksham Services Or Less Crowded Bristol Services
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: FGW Says The Choice Is More Melksham Services Or Less Crowded Bristol Services  (Read 1527 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
FGW Says The Choice Is More Melksham Services Or Less Crowded Bristol Services
« on: February 26, 2008, 09:32:34 AM »

Wiltshire Times article link.
http://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/latestheadlines/display.var.2068739.0.rail_chiefs_pledge_on_melksham_service.php

Quote from: FGW
"It is a difficult balancing act between on the one hand obtaining and paying for additional resources, and on the other deciding how best those resources should be used.

"Should an extra carriage if it becomes available be used to provide more services for Melksham, or to ease crowding on peak time services in and out of Bristol?

"We have already devoted a lot of time to looking at options for Melksham and will continue to do so. We have certainly not reached a conclusion that other priorities are more important."
« Last Edit: February 26, 2008, 09:36:59 AM by Lee » Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: FGW Says The Choice Is More Melksham Services Or Less Crowded Bristol Servic
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 10:13:06 AM »

The groups campaigning for an improved service from West Wiltshire to Swindon, which would include a decent service for Melksham, very much appreciate all the work the First Great Western are putting in to help achieve this.

There is regular overcrowding in many places, including from Trowbridge to Bath on which  most regular rush hour travellers have been turned away from overfull trains. Some of that overcrowding is caused by travellers from Frome, Warminster, Westbury and Trowbridge to Swindon who (at present) have to change in Bath.  A direct morning train from the West Wiltshire towns of Warminster, Westbury, Trowbridge and Melksham arriving into Swindon at about a quarter to 9, and a return service leaving Swindon shortly before 6 p.m. would reduce the numbers of people turned away from the West Wilts to Bristol services AND would improve travel to / from Swindon.  We should remember that some 120,000 journeys a year were made on the line from West Wilsthire to Swindon prior to the service cuts made by First in December 2006 - but the current service which First admit is "hardly an attractive proposition" is used (my estimate) for less that 10,000 journeys a year. That gives you some measure of the overcrowding that would be pulled off surrounding train services, and roads such as the A350, by a more appropriate service.

In rail company terms, the stock allocation for a carriage to run on the line is relatively minor.  According to published industry figures, First Great Western run 776 carriages and we're talking about ONE.  So First's comment that they have other priorities too is appreciated.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 19 queries.