Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 03:09:12 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97659 Members
Latest Member: qogftylbvuy
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Greater Britain
| | |-+  DfT Advice On The Prioritisation Of Smaller Transport Schemes
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: DfT Advice On The Prioritisation Of Smaller Transport Schemes  (Read 1064 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
DfT Advice On The Prioritisation Of Smaller Transport Schemes
« on: January 22, 2008, 10:59:40 AM »

"Effective scheme prioritisation is a challenging process for local authorities and there is little specific guidance on how they should prioritise smaller integrated transport schemes (typically less than £250,000), which collectively make up a significant proportion of LTP expenditure. So this Advice focuses on the prioritisation of expenditure on capital-based LTP Integrated Transport schemes. Expenditure on revenue measures and maintenance is considered within the context of an overall integrated transport prioritisation process." (link below.)
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/ltp/guidance/prioritisation/
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 19 queries.