Here is a link to a November 2004 Guardian article.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5068050-103630,00.htmlIt contains a list of "the least-used lines in Britain."
Here is the South West section of this list.
St Erth-St Ives
Truro-Falmouth
Par-Newquay
Liskeard-Looe
Plymouth-Gunnislake
Exmouth-Barnstaple
Bristol-Severn Beach
Bristol-Weymouth
Swindon-Southampton
All of the above services (including Bristol - Weymouth where service cuts to some intermediate stations were proposed) had cuts of some kind proposed in the original FGW Draft Timetable , which were based on what we now know to be dubious usage figures.
Here are some quotes from the November 2004 Guardian article :
"Tomorrow the Department of Transport will publish its community rail development strategy."
"This promises a blueprint to save nearly 60 of the most under-used services in Britain. But other transport initiatives have prompted fears of a clear-out of under-performing services."
"Rail experts say the axing of Britain's worst-performing services is long overdue. Subsidies for all rail services have ballooned to more than £4bn a year. Could it even be time, some whisper, to launch a Beeching II cutback - a second phase of the rail line culling named after Dr Richard Beeching who, as British Railways Board chairman in the 1960s, oversaw the closure of 2,000 little-used stations and the tearing up of hundreds of branch lines."
"But at the same time, the Office of the Rail Regulator has revealed it is carrying out a massive exercise in pinpointing the cost of running many of these lines to 'assess the impact on infrastructure costs of changes in service patterns'."
"Last autumn the SRA's Wider Case for Rail strategy, admitted what government advisers had privately been saying for some time: 'Rail is best when it provides fast, long distance passenger services ... commuter services on busy corridors ... services to major airports [and] rail freight services for regular high volume flows.' It did not list rural services."
"Some rail leaders now privately admit that buses, shared taxis or other modes are sometimes as good as rail - a view confirmed by the success of some operators' own bus services and the choice of buses over tube trains by some London commuters."
"Penistone and six other lines will be named tomorrow as trials for the community rail strategy - which will continue marketing and reduce costs by, for example, adopting 'more appropriate' lower maintenance standards."
A list of Community Rail lines can be found in the link below.
http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=213995&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=FalseThey are ALL on the "least-used lines in Britain" list.
Here is the summary of the original Beeching Report (link below.)
http://www.shropshiretransport.info/beeching/report1/09%20SUMMARY%20OF%20THE%20REPORT.pdfHere is a link that explains the calculation used by Beeching.
http://www.shropshiretransport.info/beeching/report1/15%20Appendix%202.pdfThe link above also contains the services that he proposed for withdrawal or modification and lists the stations that were to close as a result (not all of them did , and some , like Melksham , closed and then re-opened at a later date.)
Here is a link to the JSPTU Rail Vision. Click on this and read through it.
http://www.jsptu-avon.gov.uk/publications/documents/railstrategy.pdfThen click on the link below.
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=421.msg1243#msg1243(Post edited to add updated links.)