Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 04:06:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97602 Members
Latest Member: arradsbah
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  The Future
| | |-+  Beeching 2 Background Article
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Beeching 2 Background Article  (Read 3141 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Beeching 2 Background Article
« on: August 20, 2006, 01:00:17 PM »

Here is a link to a November 2004 Guardian article.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5068050-103630,00.html

It contains a list of "the least-used lines in Britain."

Here is the South West section of this list.

St Erth-St Ives
Truro-Falmouth
Par-Newquay
Liskeard-Looe
Plymouth-Gunnislake
Exmouth-Barnstaple
Bristol-Severn Beach
Bristol-Weymouth
Swindon-Southampton

All of the above services (including Bristol - Weymouth where service cuts to some intermediate stations were proposed) had cuts of some kind proposed in the original FGW Draft Timetable , which were based on what we now know to be dubious usage figures.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Beeching 2 Background Article
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2006, 01:26:33 PM »

Here is a quote from the Network Rail Business Plan 2006 (Page 8 of the link below.)
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/3103_Route%204%20Wessex%20Routes.pdf

"It not expected that any service enhancements are required on the line from Castle Cary to Dorchester (although journey time reductions are aspired to by local stakeholders and opportunities will be sought to achieve this in conjunction with other activity)."

Here is how SLC2 attempted to address the issue above :

F4 WESTBURY – WEYMOUTH
 
1 Route Definition

1.1 Services shall be provided between Westbury and Weymouth calling at Frome, Bruton, Castle Cary, Yeovil Pen Mill, Yetminster, Maiden Newton and Dorchester West.

1.2 Limited Stops shall be made at Thornford, Chetnole and Upwey.

1.3 Services may be joined to services specified in Route F2 (Bristol Temple Meads - Westbury) or Route F5 (Westbury – Swindon).

2 Frequency

2.1 Mondays to Fridays

(c) Between and including the Early and Late Services, eight services shall be provided at two-hourly intervals.

3 Limited Stops

3.1 Thornford and Chetnole

On Mondays to Fridays and Saturdays, one service shall call.

As we now know , this is not how it turned out in the final First Great Western Timetable. Here is a quote from the time :

"Services between Bristol Temple Meads and Weymouth will be retimed to better suit leisure and commuter customers on the line, including the retiming of a morning peak service from Frome to Bristol Temple Meads. Connections at Castle Cary to and from the West of England will be improved as a result."

Even if Westbury - Weymouth line customers had recieved a 2-hourly service , then I doubt it would have lasted for long.

Both the Merehead & Whatley Quarry lines (either side of Frome) are projected to achieve high - level growth to 2015 (Page 8 , Figure 11 of the link below.)
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/3110_Route%2012%20Reading%20to%20Penzance.pdf

This is due to a projected massive demand for materials during the construction phase of the London 2012 Olympics , which is likely to require a big increase in the number of freight trains from both quarries.

These freight trains , which will be considered essential , will in turn require train paths.

(Post edited to remove defunct link)
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 01:31:11 PM by Lee » Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Beeching 2 Background Article
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2006, 02:17:01 PM »

Here are a couple of quotes from the Network Rail Business Plan 2006 :

"The creation of the Greater Western franchise in April 2006 will see the introduction of a simplified train service structure for the route, particularly west of Taunton, from December 2006. This will eradicate some of the current service duplication and better meet existing demand."

"Expenditure

The age of rail and sleepers on the route is amongst the highest on the national network and varies between 30 and 40 years old and to address this we are implementing a track renewals strategy which matches the traffic usage of the route. This will include the deployment of Network Rail’s new High Output equipment on the most intensely used part of the route, between Reading and Exeter, to deliver a higher track quality with absolute minimum rail failures; more conventional targeted renewals will be carried out on the less intensely used sections beyond Exeter, with patch repairs and renewals to maintain stable infrastructure on the more rural branch lines."

It will not have escaped your attention that ALL of the Devon & Cornwall Branch Lines feature on the "least-used lines in Britain" list.

Here is an example from the 1980's (BR days) of where such a track renewals strategy can lead (links below.)
http://home.clara.net/wealdenline/etw_annex/etwgal/0etw_t.html
http://home.clara.net/wealdenline/rcntpicgal/1106.html

Here is a quote from the above link :

"With the closure of Tunbridge Wells West station in July 1985, it was with almost indecent haste that steps were taken to realise the lucrative redevelopment potential of the site by constructing a large shopping centre."

"It is interesting to reflect that in this way, a transport site which had the potential to contribute to a reduction in local road traffic has now become a very significant local generator of such traffic."

Here is a link that highlights how the closure process works today.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_railways/documents/page/dft_railways_039661.pdf

Here is one that highlights how the closure process would work under the new DfT Closure Guidance.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/F3641215?thread=2441627

(Post edited to add updated links. The new DfT Closure Guidance came into effect on 1 December 2006)
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 05:38:25 PM by Lee » Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Beeching 2 Background Article
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2006, 10:51:08 AM »

Here is a link to a November 2004 Guardian article.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5068050-103630,00.html

It contains a list of "the least-used lines in Britain."

Here is the South West section of this list.

St Erth-St Ives
Truro-Falmouth
Par-Newquay
Liskeard-Looe
Plymouth-Gunnislake
Exmouth-Barnstaple
Bristol-Severn Beach
Bristol-Weymouth
Swindon-Southampton

All of the above services (including Bristol - Weymouth where service cuts to some intermediate stations were proposed) had cuts of some kind proposed in the original FGW Draft Timetable , which were based on what we now know to be dubious usage figures.

Here are some quotes from the November 2004 Guardian article :

"Tomorrow the Department of Transport will publish its community rail development strategy."

"This promises a blueprint to save nearly 60 of the most under-used services in Britain. But other transport initiatives have prompted fears of a clear-out of under-performing services."

"Rail experts say the axing of Britain's worst-performing services is long overdue. Subsidies for all rail services have ballooned to more than £4bn a year. Could it even be time, some whisper, to launch a Beeching II cutback - a second phase of the rail line culling named after Dr Richard Beeching who, as British Railways Board chairman in the 1960s, oversaw the closure of 2,000 little-used stations and the tearing up of hundreds of branch lines."

"But at the same time, the Office of the Rail Regulator has revealed it is carrying out a massive exercise in pinpointing the cost of running many of these lines to 'assess the impact on infrastructure costs of changes in service patterns'."

"Last autumn the SRA's Wider Case for Rail strategy, admitted what government advisers had privately been saying for some time: 'Rail is best when it provides fast, long distance passenger services ... commuter services on busy corridors ... services to major airports [and] rail freight services for regular high volume flows.' It did not list rural services."

"Some rail leaders now privately admit that buses, shared taxis or other modes are sometimes as good as rail - a view confirmed by the success of some operators' own bus services and the choice of buses over tube trains by some London commuters."

"Penistone and six other lines will be named tomorrow as trials for the community rail strategy - which will continue marketing and reduce costs by, for example, adopting 'more appropriate' lower maintenance standards."

A list of Community Rail lines can be found in the link below.
http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=213995&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=False

They are ALL on the "least-used lines in Britain" list.

Here is the summary of the original Beeching Report (link below.)
http://www.shropshiretransport.info/beeching/report1/09%20SUMMARY%20OF%20THE%20REPORT.pdf

Here is a link that explains the calculation used by Beeching.
http://www.shropshiretransport.info/beeching/report1/15%20Appendix%202.pdf

The link above also contains the services that he proposed for withdrawal or modification and lists the stations that were to close as a result (not all of them did , and some , like Melksham , closed and then re-opened at a later date.)

Here is a link to the JSPTU Rail Vision. Click on this and read through it.
http://www.jsptu-avon.gov.uk/publications/documents/railstrategy.pdf

Then click on the link below.
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=421.msg1243#msg1243

(Post edited to add updated links.)
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 01:41:07 PM by Lee » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 19 queries.