|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Train faults - Jackanory? (Read 2266 times)
|
|
AFCChris
|
In a post I did yesterday I cast doubt on some of the reasons FGW were giving for the cancellation of a certain service from Paddington. I saw another thing on the afternoon train bulletin which was even more bizarre and makes me wonder whether they are just using the train fault excuse as a stock excuse. This is what I am on about:
1815 Paddington to Swansea service will no longer call at Reading. This is due to a train fault.
How the hell can a train fault cause a train not to stop at a station and they know about it more than 2 hours before this is supposed to happen?
Cheers
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Insider
|
I certainly can't think of any reason in this particular case - some of the reasons quoted on that website are very dubious! It has been known on a few occasions for a Virgin service to/from the south coast to not call at Reading when there is a fault in the rear cab (e.g. Defective speedo) and by running it via Reading West Junction they can avoid the need to reverse direction at Reading.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Ellis
|
How the hell can a train fault cause a train not to stop at a station and they know about it more than 2 hours before this is supposed to happen?
Missing out MULTIPLE stations I could understand ... some problem with the traction system and a desire not to loose time. But just one station? They don't actually say the fault was on the train to be used to form the 18:15 ... perhaps the platform that it normally uses was going to be blocked for some reason (knock on from another failure) and it had to go through on that middle line ... Sorry - far fetched. You mention Jackonory ... I woke up to Thomas the Tank engine this morning and noticed just how short of carriages all their trains seemed to be as well. Been a funny day.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sumila
|
Interesting that a train with a fault like a faulty speedo, as an example, was allowed to leave the depot like that. The rule book says it should not do so. If the fault occured during the journey, it should be taken out of service at the earliest opportunity. Seeing as the fault occured in the rear cab, surely the fault would have been known about before the train commenced its journey from the originating station? And therefore the TOC cannot care too much about providing a proper service. I find it incredulous that a train was allowed to miss a major stop such as Reading - but not in the least bit surprised that it happened! FGW seem to be increasingly allowing trains off the depot which are faulty and should therefore not leave the depot in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Insider
|
I don't think any driver would take a train 'off depot' with a fault serious enough to contravene the Rule Book. Yes, a faulty speedo is such a fault, but not when it's in the rear cab, and IF the fault had developed before it left the depot (whilst it's not ideal) surely if there were no other trains available, running the service without a call at Reading is better than cancelling it throughout?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |