Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 03:41:22 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97599 Members
Latest Member: EstiliNinslox
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Current Service
| | |-+  Rail isnt an option (2)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rail isnt an option (2)  (Read 1321 times)
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Rail isnt an option (2)
« on: September 20, 2007, 05:09:31 PM »

I've been training a delegate who lives in Bristol and works in Melksham.    He would prefer to use the train to get here daily, but due to the lack of suitable serviced he has to drive.

So that's a loss of one regular traveller all the way from Bristol to Melksham is it?   No - it's a loss of FOUR regular travellers.   He has three colleagues who do exactly the same thing, and would also prefer to "let the train take the strain".
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 19 queries.