Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 03:24:02 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97599 Members
Latest Member: EstiliNinslox
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Greater Britain
| | |-+  Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)  (Read 1580 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)
« on: September 13, 2007, 03:41:26 PM »

Ruth Kelly , Secretary of State for Transport , will be answering questions on transport issues in a live webchat on Thursday 20 September at 10:00 BST (link below.)
http://www.webchat.pm.gov.uk/index.asp?webchatID=52
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2007, 11:22:05 AM »

I have submitted the following:

The Government talks of cutting the carbon footprint and encouraging travellers to use public transport rather than private cars. But in some parts of the country key rail service have been withdrawn, leaving travellers with little option but to use private cars or impractically slower bus services. And the government does acknowledge the cost to the economy of extended journey times - in road building program evaluation, for example, a figure of 28 pence to 44 pence per minute is used to calculate the negative effect of a transport delay.

An example.

The corridor from Swindon to Salisbury includes 6 Strategically Significant Cities and Towns slated for major growth in the next 20 years. They are linked by a road intrastructure that is already creaking at the seams with major delays, and by a railway line maintained to a high standard, but with just 2 passenger trains each way a day after the majority of services were withdrawn last December.

Would Ms Kelly care to use this service as an example, and take the opportunity to announce the return of an appropriate service in the near future. I understand from talking personally with directors at First Great Western that they are more than willing to run the service, and I have also letters of support for the service from local transport authority - Wiltshire County Council.

[[I am pre-posting this question, to allow Ms Kelly as much time as possible to look into the example and come back with a good answer.  Please feel free to contact me - graham@wellho.net - for any further background information]]

* Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - (Frome) - Warminster - Salisbury. All through trains withdrawn, December 2006.

* Traffic growth from 10% to 35% compound pre annum in prior 5 years depending on which measure you look at.   SLC specification based on Jacobs report with an assumed growth of less that 1%.

* 120,000 journeys per annum - last year. Estimate for this year on new minimal, marginal times service - 6,000.

* Journey time - Trowbridge to Swindon - 35 minutes by train or 95 minutes by what is described as the express bus. So cost to economy of delay to each through passenger = 30p x (95 - 35) = 18 pounds per journey.

* 12 key traffic flows on corridor, and those flows will grow.  They are journeys people need to make.

* Melksham - town of 24,000 - now has no trains at all from 07:17 to 19:08; local survey shows that a service would be used if provided / clock face / appropriate time of day.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2007, 01:23:01 PM »

I cant seem to find your question in the transcript , Graham..........
http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page13178.asp
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2007, 02:02:21 PM »

I cant seem to find your question in the transcript , Graham..........
http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page13178.asp

Perhaps I clicked on the wrong button when I submitted it, or I come from the wrong part of the country. There were London questions, of course, and there were general questions.  One other questioner did ask a localish question and got "through":

Quote
Ben Rattigan: Will the Secretary of State intervene in the Tees Valley metro plan and expand the scheme to the Hartlepool area from the outset and also bring the scheme forward to benefit an area with the worst public transport infrastructure?

Ruth replies: There are lots of questions from all of you out there about local transport schemes and I understand that these are probably the most significant for you. However, I am really keen that decisions are made as close to local people as possible and not from Whitehall. It is not always my role to intervene in what are rightly local decisions. I am not sure if this is one that may or may not end up coming to the department. If it is, then I will have to look at the case on its merits.

I'm suspecting that this answer might signal that the TransWilts and other transport plans that don't stretch for hundreds of miles should be decided much more locally that thay have been in the past ... in which case perhaps we can start to get something along the lines that DP and AG have been working on.  One lives in hope that, with Ms Kelly's approach taken here, a request coming up from this Shire might be approved "on the nod" if it's reasonable case.
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Ruth Kelly Webchat (20/09/2007)
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2007, 11:07:25 AM »

On the other hand , such decisions could be left in the hands of the Government Office Of The South West , which has a known bias in favour of bus over rail (link below.)
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=588.msg1757#msg1757
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 19 queries.