Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 10:29:43 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97581 Members
Latest Member: zftlhiiyfq
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Greater Britain
| | |-+  DfT Closure Guidance - Minor Modifications Operational Guidance Note
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: DfT Closure Guidance - Minor Modifications Operational Guidance Note  (Read 1200 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
DfT Closure Guidance - Minor Modifications Operational Guidance Note
« on: August 23, 2007, 11:43:52 AM »

Operational guidance for applying to the Department under the Railways Act 2005 for a Minor Modification determination. The guidance applies to England and Wales. Minor Modifications in Scotland are handled by Transport Scotland (link below.)
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/passenger/stations/minoropguide

Interestingly , it looks like the removal of a platform could be treated as a "Minor Modification."

Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: DfT Closure Guidance - Minor Modifications Operational Guidance Note
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2007, 12:20:42 PM »


Interestingly , it looks like the removal of a platform could be treated as a "Minor Modification."


Does that apply where it's the ONLY platform at a station?
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: DfT Closure Guidance - Minor Modifications Operational Guidance Note
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2007, 05:13:54 PM »

It depends on "whether the use of that part of the network is necessary for the operation or use of the network in connection with the provision of railway passenger services."

If we were to use (say) Melksham as an example , then the answer to the above question would clearly be "yes." In that case , then it is not a minor modification within this provision , and the removal would have to be considered under the full closures process.

If we were talking about (say) the redundant platform at Severn Tunnel Junction , for which proposals exist to bring it back into use , then a proposal to remove the platform would be eligible to be treated as a minor modification. In this case , once eligibility has been established , the proposer should carry out a consultation with stakeholders. The consultees should include :

- Other operators using the station or network
- Network Rail
- Passenger Focus / London TravelWatch
- Welsh Assembly Government (if applicable)
- Relevant Passenger Transport Executives (if applicable)

Not the general public or local rail user groups (perish the thought.) Or , for that matter , local authorities (unless they are part of a PTE.)

The proposer should allow 4 weeks for those organisations to make representations on the proposal to the proposer. A nil response will be deemed to be agreement to the proposal.

Once all consultation responses are received , a formal application for a determination should be made to the Department enclosing full details (including plans) of the proposal for minor modification and copies of the consultation responses.

The Department will then consider the proposal against the criteria as set out in the Act and decide whether to make a determination for a minor modification based on the information provided in support of the application , and further investigation and analysis by the Department. The Secretary of State will consult further if it is felt necessary to clarify any matter , or because of potential wider impact , for example on integrated travel.

However , let me point you in the direction of Norton Bridge station in Staffordshire , where the passenger train service has been replaced by two substitution bus services. These started off as "rail - replacement" , but are now classed as "conventional." The platforms serving the Manchester via Stoke-on-Trent branch of the West Coast Main Line have been out of use since 2004 and the footbridge leading to the island platform (the only means of access to the station) has been removed in order to improve clearances. Despite this , the station is still officially regarded as being open.

Ironically , Graham used the very same example in a seperate post just a couple of days ago :

Strangley, there is some suggestion that even amongst the apparent lack of success quoted we have achieved something. I have heard it said that when the service was closed down for over a week last August, it might have returned in the form of a shuttle bus service between Trowbridge and Chippenham, to be integrated into First's 234 route in due course - the way certain services have been withdrawn in Staffordshire.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2007, 10:16:28 AM by Lee » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.102 seconds with 19 queries.