|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Warminster - MAJOR employment development (Read 3095 times)
|
|
Graham Ellis
|
Prompted by comments at last night's meeting, I note that the Regional Development Agency has bought 37 acres of land for 5.6 million pounds in Warminster for redevelopment for employment - link. It was also commented that the SWRDA has also found money to fund (or help fund?) the Westbury bypass to facilitate access to the site, on land currently used by the Army Based Repair Organisation. Further link. I have written to the SWRDA as follows, and await a reply: Dear Steve, I've been reading your news about the ex-ABRO site in Warminster, and I'm delighted to see the prospect of more jobs being brought into West Wiltshire. The Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Warminster corridor is growing rapidly, and no doubt a great deal of freight and worker traffic will travel in from the other towns along this corridor ... and this could be a major transport issue. Are you aware that the direct Swindon / Chippenham / Melksham train service to Warminster is discontinued from this December? It strikes me that the very public transport services that you'll need to service the new site are about to be snuffed out. It's very much the "11th hour" in our campaign to save this service, which has grown 8 fold in 5 years according ro figures from the Office of the Rail Regulator. At this stage, the Department for Transport in association with First hold "the key" ... and the decision appears to have been based on questionable statistics. Year on year figures show a very different picture to the DfT's one week survey from around Easter 2005. There's a lot more information at http://www.savethetrain.org.ukIs there any possibility of the SWRDA taking up the public transport issues involved here? The real sticking point is the apparent unwillingness of the DfT to look at a growing service and predicate future levels (and finance) based on those levels. Clearly, you folks ARE looking ahead, so perhaps you could help support the rail service during the development phase of the Warminster site? Please do get back with me if you would like any further specific information / to talk things though. Many thanks for taking the time to read this, and in anticipation of your help. Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Field
|
All we seem to hear from the towns on the trans wilts line is about 'development here' and ' houses there' 'centralisation of services' In other words lots of reason people will need to travel. On the subject of bypasses; I know the folks in Wesbury have been fighting for one for years, also I understand that further housing development in Melksham will also include a bypass. The trouble with bypasses is that they tend to lead to infill development and often attract more traffic to the area and casue more problems than they solve. I just look at the Chippenham Western bypass which has only been open about 10 years yet is busy all day long and resembles nothing more than a giant car park in the morning. Ironically if West Wilts people can no longer commute to Swindon by train this is the route they may take if they go bar car instead.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 12, 2006, 04:56:49 PM by Nick Field »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Ellis
|
Certainly, new roads can act as sponges to pull in traffic from many miles ... and end up with much more traffic that just that off the former roads they're immediately releiving. Thus a Westbury bypass will indeed put more pressure on the section past Leekes in Melksham, and on the Chippenham bypass; almost certainly, some traffic that currently reaches the M4 via the A36 / A46 will switch to the A350. It's an ongoing thing ... the roundabout that's 100 yards from our home is said to be "grossly overengineered for its current traffic", and much of the Chippenham bypass is structured to allow a second carriageway later. Get those fixed and you'll pull in - perhaps - Swindon to Warminster traffic that currently uses the A361 then you'll find you've got a bottlneck at the lights at Notton / Lacock.
But all there something really radical in all of this, it won't provide much faster town to town public transport services. Look at the new Semington bypass ... the buses don't use it, and the only accelleration that they've gained is from lack of traffic on the old road. It has to be that way of they're to continue to serve the communities. The practical cost way to provide a fast public service between centres in West Wilts - an area that's growing into a semi-urban community as towns march towards each other - is to use the existing rail corridor. That may involve the extra costs of redoubling Thingley to Bradford South in a few years, or putting the extra track back on the 4th platform at Westbury, and of building stations at Wootton Bassett, Lacock, Staverton/Holt and White Horse Business Park, but that's peanuts compared to the price of putting an express busway through Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury and Warminster centres and associated other roads to take the other vehicles displaced.
As regards infill, we need to look at the wider question "what do we want?". Do we want more housing built in the area, and the area to continue to grow as the economic dynamo it already is? At the other extreme, do we want to little new housing that there's a shortage of accommodation? ... remember that the average housegold size is decreasing. In 1971, 100 houses would on average hold 291 individuals. 30 years later, those same houses would hold just 233 individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |