Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 09:09:47 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97574 Members
Latest Member: hobmoxCoorn
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  The Future
| | |-+  Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service  (Read 4367 times)
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« on: July 12, 2006, 11:59:34 AM »

A Parliamentary Written Question has been asked about the Melksham train service (link below.)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmordbk1/60712w01.htm

Chris Grayling (Epsom & Ewell):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps the Government has taken to improve rail services between Swindon and Westbury and at intermediate towns to provide transport alternatives for the new housing planned in the area.

There are couple of other questions related to this issue :

Chris Grayling (Epsom & Ewell):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the reason is for the delay in his reply to the letter of 24th April 2006 from Wiltshire County Council about rail services in Wiltshire.

Chris Grayling (Epsom & Ewell):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, why his Department decided to pursue a timetable specification that does not accord with the findings of the Bristol/Bath to South Coast Study.
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2006, 02:29:23 PM »

Good.  I guess that means that someone's going to actually have to do some homework to come up with appropropriate answers;  I'll be interested to see what DT has to say, and hope for an honest answer and not a sidestep.
Logged
Sion Bretton
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 334


View Profile
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2006, 08:58:15 PM »

But why is our MP not asking these questions.
Is this because he will no longer be the MP after the next election!
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2006, 03:06:23 AM »

It's much more effective for Chris Grayling to be asking IMHO ... they are working in co-operation  Grin
Logged
Sion Bretton
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 334


View Profile
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2006, 09:53:43 PM »

Thanks Graham
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2006, 12:33:07 PM »

Here is one of the answers (link below.)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm060718/text/60718w1787.htm

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the reason is for the delay in his reply to the letter of 24 April 2006 from Wiltshire county council about rail services in Wiltshire. [85215]

Derek Twigg: My officials replied on 12 July. I apologise for the delay.

Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2006, 12:56:56 PM »

Chris Grayling (Epsom & Ewell):To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps the Government has taken to improve rail services between Swindon and Westbury and at intermediate towns to provide transport alternatives for the new housing planned in the area.

Land use planning is very much the "buzz - phrase" these days (click on http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_freight/documents/page/dft_freight_503891-07.hcsp for an earlier example relating to "Sustainable Distribution.")

Here is an example of how it should be done (links below.)
http://www.gunwharf-quays.com/history.htm
http://www.gunwharf-quays.com/howtogethere.htm
http://www.gunwharf-quays.com/play(home)-61.htm

Here is an example of how it shouldnt (link below.)
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=269.msg716#msg716
Logged
Lee
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3633


View Profile WWW
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2006, 04:03:22 PM »

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps the Government have taken to improve rail services between Swindon and Westbury and at intermediate towns to provide transport alternatives for the new housing planned in the area.

Derek Twigg: Improving rail performance is a key objective for the Department for Transport. Joint action plans are in place between Network Rail and First Great Western to address performance issues, including the Swindon to Westbury route. These are monitored monthly.

Demand for rail services between Westbury and Swindon is concentrated at peak periods, and the Government have specified direct train services at these times.

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport why his Department decided to pursue a timetable specification that does not accord with the findings of the Bristol/Bath to South Coast Study.

Derek Twigg: In preparation of the Greater Western franchise specification, an assessment was made of the existing and future demand for passenger rail traffic on the Cardiff/Bristol to Southampton/Portsmouth rail corridor; this confirmed that the existing hourly train service was adequate to cater for the demand.
Logged
WyvusArconius
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 81


View Profile
Re: Parliamentary Written Question Asked On Melksham Train Service
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2007, 11:43:54 AM »


Derek Twigg: In preparation of the Greater Western franchise specification, an assessment was made of the existing and future demand for passenger rail traffic on the Cardiff/Bristol to Southampton/Portsmouth rail corridor; this confirmed that the existing hourly train service was adequate to cater for the demand.

An hourly service is only "adequate" if there are actually enough seats on the service provided. As FGW seem determined to run those 2 unit 158's until they 'cant run no more'.. a more appropriate service provision statement would be "To provide capacity for xxx number of passengers per hour" That way FGW can either whack more carriages on or change the timings. I am all too aware that FGW does not have an infinite amount of rolling stock, but they do use what they have very ineffectively.
In short, the hourly frequency actually makes sense to me, but there NEEDS to be more seats. EVERY SINGLE PERSON I have ever spoken to about FGW service between Portsmouth and Bristol have all said the same thing.. "There are not enough seats". People down south are not best pleased, and the storm clouds on the FGW horizon continue to gather from all quarters....

« Last Edit: October 08, 2007, 11:45:25 AM by WyvusArconius » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 19 queries.