Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 07:21:11 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97493 Members
Latest Member: cmxavzng7313
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Current Service
| | |-+  Under 20 passengers per train - official. Over 50 passengers - actual
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Under 20 passengers per train - official. Over 50 passengers - actual  (Read 2819 times)
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Under 20 passengers per train - official. Over 50 passengers - actual
« on: June 09, 2006, 05:40:14 AM »

Having just written a piece about skewed statistics (on the blog - see here), I notice that 2 trains were cancelled yesterday for definite, and 2 more were showing "no information" on the departure board at the time they were due ... so they probably didn't run either.

Every cancelled train is a "double whammie" ... not only does it put people off trying the train again, but the passengers-per-train statistics that decision makers quote get skewed because they're based on trains scheduled in the timetable and not on trains actually run.
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: Under 20 passengers per train - official. Over 50 passengers - actual
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2006, 07:32:42 AM »

I'm told that the lunchtime train that showed as "no report" did actually run, although it was late. I'll revise me best estimate for that day to say that 80% of trains probably ran, rather than 60%.   It's still a far cry from targets of around 99% that are set and proudly said to be achieved on signs at stations ....
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 19 queries.