Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 06:55:49 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97489 Members
Latest Member: pelicanimages
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  The Future
| | |-+  lack of political support
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: lack of political support  (Read 3811 times)
aik4on
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


View Profile
lack of political support
« on: May 18, 2006, 06:24:47 AM »

the problem with this campaign is lack of political support.  It took only shadown transport minister chris grayling to kick up a fuss about Romsey/Dean/Dunbridge to get the Southampton - Westbury shuttle service introduced.  In the Thames Valley, Theresa May's high profile actions won considerable improvements for services from Maidenhead.

This campaign has had no real political backing with Andrew Murrisson more worried about the SWT Waterloo service and Ancram and James Gray hardly mentioning the issue.  What is Wiltshire County Council doing?  Nothing, seemingly.


Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: lack of political support
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2006, 07:26:39 AM »

Yes, I agree that political support is lacking.   Remember that both Chippenham and Melksham are being hived off from their current constituencies at the next election, so why should Gray and Ancram bother?  Note the huge difference in approach at Bedwyn, also in the Devizes constituency .... but REMAINING in at the next election
Logged
Sion Bretton
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 334


View Profile
Re: lack of political support
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2006, 04:11:56 PM »

when is the next general election?
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: lack of political support
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2006, 11:08:41 AM »

Probably in 3 or 4years. After Gordon has taken over from Tony.   So it would be up yo Gordon to set a date.   The boundary changes come in next year or in 2008.

However, we *may* now be getting some more political support  after all. Chippenham / Melksham will be a Tory / Liberal marginal.
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: lack of political support
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2006, 07:10:51 AM »

I do have emails / rumblings of more higher profile political support ... I REALLY hope to be able to publish something here and make a big splash in the next few days .... I hope it isn't a question of too little / too late ...
Logged
aik4on
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


View Profile
Re: lack of political support
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2006, 03:58:48 PM »

the potential political supporters will need to be quick.  I'm reliably informed the timetable will be set in stone by early July and no changes will then be possible until June 2007.
Logged
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Re: lack of political support
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2006, 08:08:37 PM »

I hear the same - perhaps even with shorter time scales.

I have a letter from Mr Ancram in the post, just arrived, that tells me he's taken it up with Mr Twigg again ...
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 19 queries.