Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 12:27:44 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97438 Members
Latest Member: ypjqbmvsgb
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Introductions and chat
| | |-+  On responses to the South Western Franchise
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: On responses to the South Western Franchise  (Read 2448 times)
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
On responses to the South Western Franchise
« on: May 07, 2006, 08:58:58 AM »

I was saddened to hear that one of our elected bodies here in Melksham responded to the South West trains franchise suggesting that a saving in rolling stock could be made by cutting out the Bristol, Plymouth and Torbay services - cutting back the service from Waterloo to Salisbury and Exeter.

I am very much in favour of everyone expressing their views, but this council view does not represent my view nor, as far as I can gauge, the view of other local electors around here.  Frankly, most Melksham electors have little interest in (or knowledge of) public transport in Devon and it is meddlesome at best for us to suggest that it's cut. (That's a personal view).

The letter in question is, I understand, being taken as an example of how official bodies in the area support the pruning of services, and has made the Minister's "red box" so that he's espcially aware of such views.  And the people at RailFuture who's meeting I attended yesterday and who campaign tirelessly for an appropriate level of service are not best pleased, as you might imagine.

There's a further irony.   The southern end of the Southampton to Swindon service has been given a one year reprive under First, and will then form a part of the South West trains franchise.  By suggesting that the South West Franchise is trimmed back to Salisbury / Exeter, the council that wrote is advocating the withdrawal of the extra trains that could also have been used to extend the Southampton to Westbury service of the next year on through to Melksham, Chippenham and Swindon.
Logged
Nick Field
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 423


View Profile
Re: On responses to the South Western Franchise
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2006, 05:12:38 PM »

I am intrigued to know who this council is ?
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 19 queries.