Save the Train forum

Dedicate to campaigning to retain an appropriate "TransWilts" passenger train service ... Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury - Dilton Marsh - Warminster - Salisbury ... and to other services too

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. Please use our Coffeeshop Forum for new posts

link to main site
Save the Melksham Train

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 12:32:06 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Recommended service - hourly, according to the GWRUS. Let's work towards that service and towards ensuring all services are used.
7889 Posts in 5009 Topics by 97302 Members
Latest Member: eydyyksmuu
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Save the Train
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Current Service
| | |-+  Just one passenger per coach - but that's the main line
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Just one passenger per coach - but that's the main line  (Read 1948 times)
Graham Ellis
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2062


View Profile
Just one passenger per coach - but that's the main line
« on: February 04, 2006, 08:24:52 AM »

The 21:40 train to London left Bristol yesterday evening with just ONE person in each of the first three passenger coaches ... First class carriages running nearly empty stock.  At that time of the evening, there's just one train an hour on this route though frequency has been increasing with extra trains during most of the day, and I understand that the December 2006 timetable will be up to half hourly all day.

I changed into the train that left Chippenham at 22:27 for Melksham, Trowbridge and Westbury.  There were NINE people in that one coach.

It strikes me as odd that the lowly loaded coaches are to be increased further and the more highly loaded one is under threat.  I hear talk of a lack of rolling stock, making best use of assets, etc.   And whilst I understand that those three first class coaches can't be uncoupled and run on their own, I do heartily agree that a shakup that stock that's typically carrying just one or two passengers should be re-assigned to services where there's more demand, and where the current service is so inconveniently infrequent.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Save the Train | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.666 seconds with 19 queries.