|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Best of luck (Read 2578 times)
|
|
Graz
|
Although not a traveller via Melksham, I'd like to wish you the best of luck in saving this truly vital service for residents of Wiltshire and beyond. I travel from Oldfield Park (Bath) - Cheltenham Spa and sometimes down to Trowbridge, and although journeys to Cheltenham are generally fine, I have written to the RPC about the axing of the vital Bristol Temple Meads - London Waterloo service because services south of Bristol are always so crowded. Looking at the statistics of rising rail travel around Melksham (and the Westcountry in general), it's a wonder that First or the DFT haven't said or done anything about it by now.
I will pay a visit to Melksham in the summer (By train, of course!) and keep checking the site for updates, so in the meantime I hope First listen to the concerns and do something about it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Ellis
|
Many thanks for your wishes. The Wessex Trains routes south through Westbury have been suffering a lack of resources - it seems that there's been too much traffic, too few coaches and too few train crews for the growing traffic ... so that service justification is NOT based on what makes economic sense, but on what they've managed to provide.
With an appropriate number of trains and crews, a much more reliable service could be provided and - as far as I can see from information avaialble - it would be profitable too, and traffic would continue to grow. But investment has been sadly lacking - after all, why SHOULD the previous operator have invested for the long term when they only had a quite short term contract to operate the line(s)?
On "The Waterloo" ... wouldn't it be an excellent solution if the Bristol to Portmouth train was reliable and not overcrowded and connected well every hour at Salisbury? At present, you've got two trains running from Bristol to Salisbury within a few minutes of each other. My only fear of using a connection rather than a through train is that it stifles any competition ....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |