|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: "Local trains hit by underfunding" - This Is Wiltshire (15/03/2010) (Read 936 times)
|
|
Lee
|
From This Is Wiltshire:Local trains hit by underfunding
A rail watchdog has condemned the lack of investment by the Department of Transport in Swindon and the south west trains.
TravelWatch SouthWest, a public transport passenger pressure group, claims the DfT has failed to provide an adequate number of carriages to meet growing demand in Swindon and neighbouring towns and cities.
The organisation made the claims a day after the Government announced it was investing billions of pounds in electrification and in the building of a new high-speed line linking London with Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester.
The organisation believes the plans fail to adequately deal with ongoing issues in the M4 corridor – home of Britain’s information economy – or as it is sometimes referred to the UK’s Silicon Valley.
Chris Irwin, the chairman of TravelWatch SouthWest, said: “Lord Adonis (the Transport Secretary) has announced the spending of thirty billion pounds on the building of a new high-speed line between London, and the Midlands and the North of England.
“Meanwhile there is fully justified and rising concern about overcrowded train services in all the significant urban conurbations in the region with passengers frequently left standing on the platform “The trains are great news for many, but rail passengers in the south west continue to suffer severe overcrowding on local and regional services and are frequently unable to even board some trains.”
Plans for a new £30 billion high-speed rail network, with 225mph trains, was announced by the Government on Thursday.
Running from Euston in London, the first part of the route –- from London to Birmingham – would start in 2017, cost between £15.8bn and £17.4bn and reduce the journey time between the UK’s two biggest cities to between 30 and 50 minutes.
Eventually the plans also hope to drastically reduce rail journey times on the 335-mile London to Scotland High Speed Rail network.
A DfT spokesman said: “Transferring long distance journeys between the major cities onto the high speed network releases capacity on the conventional network which could be used to enhance commuter, suburban and freight services. “Total public expenditure on transport (including road and rail, local authorities and public corporations) in the south west has increased by 30 per cent in the last five years from £854m in 2003/04 to £1,113m in 2007/08.”
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Ellis
|
Putting the 30 billion pounds into context ... what could be done in the South West with just one Billion?
Reopen to Portishead [40 million] Provide a 30 minute service to Portishead for 30 years [19 million]
Provide an hourly TransWilts service for 30 years [19 million]
Reopen to Tavistock [20 million] Provide an hourly Tavistock to Plymouth service [19 million]
Reopen Stations at Batheaston (Bath Parkway), Corsham, Wootton Bassett and Wantage Road [22 million] Provide an hourly Bristol to Didcot service [19 million]
Extend Portsmouth - Cardiff trains to 5 carriages [18 million]
Oh goodness - I'm only up to a fifth of the billion that I suggested we look at - which is just one thirtieth of the Adonis scheme. I've included the cost of new vehicles for the services, I've gone with the most expensive (pessimistic) estimates for Portishead, I'm assuming significant subsidy based on the government's low growth figures as used in the recent RUS. I know that some costings have a 66% pessimism factor in them to allow for historic overruns ... basically I am trying to pump up the price to use even a fraction of that money.
So ... reopen to Radstock, and via Okehampton to Plymouth. Double the length of Cross Country trains. Extra capacity at Westbury, Chippenham, .... yes, many of the GWRUS schemes; we can learn the bet ones from there.
I'm going to speculate that the High Speed may not happen - I'm going to speculate that it may be electioneering. If spending promises like this get Labour back into power ("buying votes in their heartland") the scheme is sufficiently far into the future for it to be changed; if the Conservatives get in and scrap it, then that will give the now-opposition Labour a club to hit the new government with. So suggesting what could be done with a tiny fraction of the money is a bit theoretical.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |